ECB Education
E-mail: [javascript protected email address]
Children growing up in low-income families face numerous challenges that put their emotional well-being at risk. These challenges can arise from their homes, schools, and communities. Professionals in psychology, social work, and education play a vital role in understanding the specific factors that contribute to poor social-emotional skills in these children. With approximately 41% of children in the United States coming from low-income families, it is essential to adopt innovative approaches that shed light on this complex issue. In this article, we explore an exciting new perspective that provides valuable insights for professionals working with these children—the person-centered approach.
Professionals turn to Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems theory to understand the impact of risk factors on children's development. This theory emphasizes the interplay between a child and their environment, highlighting how disruptions in this relationship can hinder healthy development. The theory illustrates how each layer of the environment, from immediate surroundings to broader societal influences, shapes a child's development. However, the accumulation of risk factors can disrupt this process and hinder their well-being.
Extensive research consistently demonstrates that children from low-income families often face multiple risk factors, resulting in poorer developmental outcomes. For instance, exposure to early life stress can impair cognitive flexibility, executive functioning, and self-control. Poverty itself can impact social-emotional abilities, affecting social skills and increasing internalizing behaviors. Importantly, these challenges can persist beyond childhood, affecting school performance, social interactions, and even adult cognitive functioning.
Understanding risk factors requires a nuanced approach, as the existing literature lacks a consistent definition or measurement of these factors. Different studies employ various methods and measures, making it difficult to compare findings. The person-centered approach, particularly latent class analysis (LCA), offers a valuable perspective in this regard.
Unlike traditional approaches that treat risk factors as puzzle pieces to be added up, LCA makes it possible to identify distinct subgroups of risk based on different combinations of these factors. This approach provides a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of the specific risk profiles associated with different outcomes. It is akin to unraveling the hidden patterns within the puzzle.
Researchers from the Universities of South Carolina, Alabama and Missouri who utilized LCA in a study conducted within a Head Start program—a support system for low-income families—discovered three distinct subgroups of risk: the systemic risk group, the systemic and economic risk group, and the systemic, economic, and family stress risk group.
The systemic risk group primarily faced challenges related to systemic inequalities, with a significant portion of participants identifying as ethnic minorities. The systemic and economic risk group, comprising the largest subgroup, consisted of individuals from low-income, minority, and single-parent households. The smallest subgroup, the systemic, economic, and family stress risk group, experienced high levels of risk across various factors, particularly parental depression, stress, and significant threatening experiences.
The study's findings highlight the importance of family stress factors in children's social-emotional development. Notably, the systemic, economic, and family stress risk group consistently displayed lower social-emotional scores compared to the other two risk groups. Surprisingly, there were no significant differences in social-emotional outcomes between the systemic risk group and the systemic and economic risk group. This suggests that economic hardships alone may not be the main driver of social-emotional difficulties. Instead, the addition of family stress factors layered on top of systemic and economic risks appears to play a crucial role. In other words, it's like the perfect storm for social-emotional challenges.
These findings align with the family stress model, which emphasizes how economic hardships and pressure can impact child outcomes through disrupted parental psychological functioning. Parental depression, stress, and significant threatening experiences have consistently been linked to various negative outcomes in children, from delayed language development to emotional difficulties. Addressing parental well-being becomes a critical intervention point for supporting children's optimal social-emotional development.
The person-centered approach offers valuable insights for professionals in psychology, social work, and education working with at-risk children and families. By identifying distinct risk subgroups and recognizing the crucial role of family stress factors, professionals can tailor interventions to address the specific needs of families facing adversity. Focusing on parental psychological well-being, particularly addressing depression and stress, can provide targeted support to enhance children's social-emotional development.
However, according to the researchers, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. Since it relied on secondary data analysis, additional risk factors and protective factors were not included. Future research should consider a broader range of factors and explore various risk and protective factor combinations. Additionally, the study's sample consisted of participants from a Head Start program, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Further studies with more diverse samples are necessary to understand the different risk subgroups prevalent in various communities.
In conclusion, the person-centered approach offers a new perspective on understanding risk factors for social-emotional skills in preschoolers from low-income families. By identifying distinct risk subgroups and emphasizing the role of family stress factors, professionals gain valuable insights for tailoring interventions and support for at-risk children. The complexity of risk necessitates innovative approaches to address the unique needs of these children. By decoding the puzzle of risk factors, professionals can pave the way for brighter futures for children who need our support the most.
The scientific paper that reports on this research can be accessed for free in its entirety in Infant and Child Development.
Is it part of your job to talk with kids about adversity and personal tragedies? Join our online masterclass "Talking with Kids about Personal and Global Tragedy" with Dr. Jeff Temple!